The Requirements and Peculiarities of Institutional Cryptocurrency Custody

The adoption of cryptocurrencies by institutional investors has significantly increased in recent years. Hedge funds, family offices, and publicly traded companies are now recognizing the potential of digital assets as an alternative investment class. Institutions treat cryptocurrencies differently than retail investors, focusing on security, regulatory compliance, and risk management. They primarily invest in crypto through direct purchases, venture capital allocations, or indirect exposure via financial instruments such as Bitcoin ETFs.

A prime example of institutional adoption is MicroStrategy, which has amassed billions in Bitcoin as a treasury asset. Similarly, Block (formerly Square) has made substantial Bitcoin purchases. Large asset managers like Fidelity Investments and BlackRock have also entered the space, exploring ways to integrate cryptocurrencies into their portfolios.

To facilitate institutional adoption, various crypto-as-a-service solutions have emerged, allowing institutions to access and manage digital assets without dealing with complex blockchain infrastructure. However, as institutions invest in crypto, one of the primary concerns is the safekeeping of these assets, highlighting the need for robust institutional crypto custody solutions.

The Importance of Institutional Crypto Custody

Institutional investors require a secure and compliant environment for holding digital assets. Unlike retail investors, who may store their crypto in personal wallets or on exchanges, institutions must adhere to strict regulations and governance standards. Crypto custody services are essential to ensure asset protection, prevent unauthorized access, and reduce risks such as theft, fraud, or loss.

In the USA, the SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) imposes strict guidelines on institutional crypto holdings. For instance, they have the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. SEC has implemented rules under this Act, specifically the “custody rule” (Rule 206(4)-2), which mandates that registered investment advisers who have custody of client funds or securities must maintain those assets with a qualified custodian. This means institutions cannot simply rely on hot wallets or standard crypto exchanges — they need institutional-grade crypto custody solutions that comply with legal frameworks.

Furthermore, insurance-backed custody services provide an additional layer of protection, safeguarding institutional investments against cyber threats and operational risks. Given the high value of institutional crypto holdings, secure custody solutions are not just an option but a necessity.

Crypto Custody Solutions for Institutions – What Should They Be Like?

Institutional investors require specialized crypto custody solutions that meet stringent security, compliance, and operational needs. The core requirements include the following aspects: regulatory compliance, risk management, insurance, institutional-grade infrastructure, and governance and access control.

Let’s begin with regulatory compliance. Institutions must ensure that their chosen custody solutions comply with local and international financial regulations. This includes adhering to AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and KYC (Know Your Customer) standards, as well as obtaining necessary licenses from financial authorities.

Security is paramount in institutional crypto custody. Solutions should feature multi-layered security mechanisms, including:

• Cold storage — storing digital assets in offline wallets to prevent hacking.
• Multi-signature authentication — requiring multiple approvals before executing transactions.
• Hardware security modules (HSMs) — using tamper-resistant hardware to safeguard private keys.
• Air-gapped storage — ensuring that private keys are never exposed to Internet-connected systems.
• Continuous security audits — implementing regular audits by independent security firms to identify vulnerabilities.
• Zero-trust architecture — employing a model where no single entity has full access to stored assets, reducing internal risk.
• Multi-Party Computation (MPC) — this technique breaks down private keys into smaller encrypted pieces, enhancing security.
• Withdrawal limits and time locks — these features minimize the window of opportunity for potential misdeeds.

Leading crypto custodian services offer insurance policies to cover potential losses due to cyberattacks or operational failures. Institutions should ensure their custodian partners provide comprehensive insurance backed by reputable insurers. Custodians with coverage for theft, fraud, and unauthorized transactions provide an added level of security.

Custody solutions must integrate seamlessly with institutional workflows. This includes:

• API connectivity — enabling automated transactions and reporting.
• Scalability — supporting large transaction volumes without compromising security.
• Audit and reporting capabilities — providing transparency for regulatory compliance.
• Customizable governance controls — allowing institutions to set specific approval policies for transactions.
• Redundancy and disaster recovery plans — ensuring business continuity in case of system failures or cyber incidents.

Governance and access control. Institutional custody solutions should implement granular access control, ensuring only authorized personnel can manage funds. Role-based access management (RBAC) and audit trails are crucial for internal security and regulatory compliance. Additionally, custodians may offer:

• Time-locked transactions — delaying large transfers for added security.
• Whitelisting of withdrawal addresses — restricting transactions to pre-approved addresses.
• Biometric authentication — adding an additional layer of access security through fingerprint or facial recognition.

Choosing Crypto Custody Providers for a Company – What Should Be Considered?

Selecting a cryptocurrency custody service is a critical decision for any institution. Here are the key factors to consider when choosing a crypto custodian service:

• Security standards. Institutions should evaluate the security measures implemented by the custodian, including compliance with industry security certifications such as SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and CCSS (CryptoCurrency Security Standard). This includes encryption standards, cyber threat mitigation strategies, and physical security measures for cold storage facilities.
• Regulatory licensing and compliance. A credible custody provider must possess the necessary licenses and adhere to regulatory standards. Institutions should verify the custodian’s compliance with financial regulators such as FINMA (Switzerland), FCA (UK), or OCC (U.S.).
• Asset insurance. Insurance coverage is vital to hedge against potential losses. Institutions should work with custodians who provide coverage from leading insurance providers, ensuring reimbursement in the event of an asset compromise.
• Service customization and institutional support. Different institutions have unique needs. A reliable custodian should offer tailored solutions, including separate accounts, dedicated client support, and flexible reporting tools.
• Integration with trading and settlement platforms. For institutions actively trading crypto, a custody solution should seamlessly integrate with trading desks, OTC desks, and settlement networks. Efficient integration minimizes transaction delays and enhances liquidity management.

Institutional investors require robust crypto custody solutions to manage their digital assets securely. With increasing regulatory oversight and security concerns, institutions cannot rely on standard wallet solutions. Instead, they need crypto custody services that offer regulatory compliance, advanced security features, and institutional-grade infrastructure. By carefully selecting a cryptocurrency custody service, institutions can ensure the safety of their investments, reduce risks, and comply with financial regulations.

Read Also: mydesi